Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)Ram Gati Chaube vs Ran Adhar Chaube on 17 May, 1961
14. It was urged by the learned counsel for the defendant-respondent that even on the assumption that the compromise dated 13-2-1963 was a family arrangement, it could not be pressed into aid by the plaintiff for admittedly it was not a registered document even though the subject matter thereof was of a value in excess of Rs. 100/-. It could not therefore, be looked into for
any purpose whatever nor could the plaintiff claim to assail the sale deed in favour of the defendant-respondent on account of the stipulation contained therein. Reliance was placed, in support of his submission, by the learned counsel upon a Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Ram Gati Chaube v. Ram Adhar Chaube (AIR 1961 All 537). It was observed by the Full Bench in that case that, inasmuch as, the compromise application, which was up for consideration before it, declared rights to immoveable property worth more than Rs. 100/-, it required registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act and not being registered, it was ineffective and inadmissible in evidence.
Hari Shankar vs Durga Devi And Anr. on 31 March, 1977
15. The decision of the Full Bench does not help the defendant-respondent for, as observed in Hari Shanker v. Durga Devi (1977 All WC 375) : (AIR 1977 All 455) it was not dealing with A case where the compromise in question was specified and he document recorded the entire compromise between the parties.
1