cites: 83410320

M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October, 2006

125. We have not examined the validity of individual enactments of appropriate States and that question will be gone into in individual writ petition by the appropriate Bench in accordance with law laid down by us in the present case.

Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 793 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

Article 335 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 10 - Cited by 1598

Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 12 - Cited by 38486

THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY-FIRST AMENDMENT) ACT, 2000

Constitution and Amendments Cites 0 - Cited by 132

THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002

Constitution and Amendments Cites 0 - Cited by 145

THE CONSTITUTION (SEVENTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 1995

Constitution and Amendments Cites 0 - Cited by 111

THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 2000

Constitution and Amendments Cites 0 - Cited by 98

Civil Writ Petition No. 13007 Of vs State Of Punjab And Others on 12 May, 2010

"D.O.No.9/2/2006-1Admn.1/5448 Chief Secretary to Govt. of Punjab Dated Chandigarh 30.3.2011 Sub: Civil Writ Petition No.16733 of 2006-Hari Singh Vs. Punjab State.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 140 - Full Document

M R Nagaraja vs The Government Of India on 28 January, 2011

The Supreme Court of India has finally decided the matter M.Nagraja and others versus Union of India, the Punjab Government has decided to continue the instructions issued in this regard vide its letter No.3/34/99-3PP-1/17646 dated 15.12.2005.

Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

All India Lawyers Forum For Civil ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 19 April, 1999

In this connection, it is informed that in view of interim orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court in IA No.2 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.61/2002-M.Nagraja and others versus Union of India and others and Writ Petition (Civil No.234/2002- All India Equality Form and others versus Union of India and others and other allied cases, the Punjab Government vide its letter No.3/34/99-3PP-1/.17646 dated 15.12.2005 has decided that the Scheduled Caste employees promoted to any class or classes of posts under he reservation policy, will be prospectively entitled to "consequential seniority' on the post to which they are promoted subject to the final decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the said cases.

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Article 335 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]