Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 108 (0.43 seconds)Section 3 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 45 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022
22. It has been specifically laid down in the said decision that the
statements recorded by the authorities under Section 50 PMLA are
not hit by Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution, rather such
statements recorded by the authority in the course of inquiry are
deemed to be the judicial proceedings in terms of Section 50(4),
and are admissible in evidence, whereas the statements made by
any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation
under Ch. XII of the Code could not be used for any purpose,
except for the purpose stated in the proviso to Section 162 of the
Code. In view of such glaring inconsistencies between Section
50 PMLA and Sections 160/161CrPC, the provisions of Section
50 PMLA would prevail in terms of Section 71 read with Section
65 thereof."
Section 19 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Pankaj Bansal vs Union Of India And Others on 26 July, 2023
The
arrest of the said appellant was on 03.10.2023 but the
judgment rendered in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs.
Union of India & Ors (supra) has been uploaded on
04.10.2023 and as such the ground was taken not to give
any aid of judgment passed in the case of Pankaj Bansal
Vs. Union of India & Ors (supra) even though the written
communication regarding the ground of arrest of the
appellant has not been furnished but the Hon'ble Apex
Court has passed the order that merely because the
judgment in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs. Union of India
& Ors (supra) has been uploaded on 04.10.2023 but the
said Prabir Purkayastha was arrested on 04.10.2023 while
54
2025:JHHC:33869
the judgment passed in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs.
Union of India & Ors (supra) was delivered on 03.10.2023
and as such the case of Prabir Purkayastha has come
within the ratio of judgment rendered in the case of Pankaj
Bansal Vs. Union of India & Ors (supra) and since the
written communication was not there, hence, he was
directed to be released on bail, for ready reference the
relevant paragraph is being quoted as under::