Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.38 seconds)
Utsav Safety Systems Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 30 November, 2011 cites

Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979

In support Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -10- *** of his submissions, the petitioner relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489, Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others (2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 287, W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others (2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 451, B.S.N. Joshi and sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others (2006) 11 Supreme Court Cases 548, Reliance Energy Ltd. and another Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2007) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1, Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2008) 16 Supreme Court Cases 215 and Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 430. The stress on the change of rules after game had begun and its impermissibility was sought to be driven home by placing reliance upon the judgments quoted above and by arguing that once the stage of financial bids had been reached then if there was any essential condition in the terms of the tender, the same had to be adhered to. It was argued that sum total of the Form II rates could not be more than the rate quoted in Form I for complete set of number plates in different categories of vehicles, therefore, once there was such a difference, the State had no option but to Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -11- *** reject the bid of respondent no.3.
Supreme Court of India Cites 47 - Cited by 2519 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd vs Commissioner Ulhasnagar Municipal ... on 8 May, 2000

In support Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -10- *** of his submissions, the petitioner relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489, Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others (2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 287, W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others (2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 451, B.S.N. Joshi and sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others (2006) 11 Supreme Court Cases 548, Reliance Energy Ltd. and another Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2007) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1, Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2008) 16 Supreme Court Cases 215 and Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 430. The stress on the change of rules after game had begun and its impermissibility was sought to be driven home by placing reliance upon the judgments quoted above and by arguing that once the stage of financial bids had been reached then if there was any essential condition in the terms of the tender, the same had to be adhered to. It was argued that sum total of the Form II rates could not be more than the rate quoted in Form I for complete set of number plates in different categories of vehicles, therefore, once there was such a difference, the State had no option but to Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -11- *** reject the bid of respondent no.3.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 324 - Full Document

West Bengal State Electricity Board vs Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. & Ors on 15 January, 2001

In support Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -10- *** of his submissions, the petitioner relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489, Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others (2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 287, W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others (2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 451, B.S.N. Joshi and sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others (2006) 11 Supreme Court Cases 548, Reliance Energy Ltd. and another Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2007) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1, Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2008) 16 Supreme Court Cases 215 and Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 430. The stress on the change of rules after game had begun and its impermissibility was sought to be driven home by placing reliance upon the judgments quoted above and by arguing that once the stage of financial bids had been reached then if there was any essential condition in the terms of the tender, the same had to be adhered to. It was argued that sum total of the Form II rates could not be more than the rate quoted in Form I for complete set of number plates in different categories of vehicles, therefore, once there was such a difference, the State had no option but to Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -11- *** reject the bid of respondent no.3.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 342 - S S Quadri - Full Document

Mr. B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd vs Nair Coal Services Ltd. & Ors on 31 October, 2006

In support Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -10- *** of his submissions, the petitioner relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489, Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others (2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 287, W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others (2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 451, B.S.N. Joshi and sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others (2006) 11 Supreme Court Cases 548, Reliance Energy Ltd. and another Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2007) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1, Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2008) 16 Supreme Court Cases 215 and Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 430. The stress on the change of rules after game had begun and its impermissibility was sought to be driven home by placing reliance upon the judgments quoted above and by arguing that once the stage of financial bids had been reached then if there was any essential condition in the terms of the tender, the same had to be adhered to. It was argued that sum total of the Form II rates could not be more than the rate quoted in Form I for complete set of number plates in different categories of vehicles, therefore, once there was such a difference, the State had no option but to Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -11- *** reject the bid of respondent no.3.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 458 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Reliance Energy Limited & Another vs Maharashtra State Road Development ... on 11 September, 2007

In support Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -10- *** of his submissions, the petitioner relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489, Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others (2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 287, W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others (2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 451, B.S.N. Joshi and sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others (2006) 11 Supreme Court Cases 548, Reliance Energy Ltd. and another Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2007) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1, Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2008) 16 Supreme Court Cases 215 and Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 430. The stress on the change of rules after game had begun and its impermissibility was sought to be driven home by placing reliance upon the judgments quoted above and by arguing that once the stage of financial bids had been reached then if there was any essential condition in the terms of the tender, the same had to be adhered to. It was argued that sum total of the Form II rates could not be more than the rate quoted in Form I for complete set of number plates in different categories of vehicles, therefore, once there was such a difference, the State had no option but to Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -11- *** reject the bid of respondent no.3.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 249 - Full Document

Larsen And Toubro Ltd & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 May, 2011

In support Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -10- *** of his submissions, the petitioner relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489, Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others (2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 287, W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others (2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 451, B.S.N. Joshi and sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others (2006) 11 Supreme Court Cases 548, Reliance Energy Ltd. and another Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2007) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1, Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2008) 16 Supreme Court Cases 215 and Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. Union of India and others (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 430. The stress on the change of rules after game had begun and its impermissibility was sought to be driven home by placing reliance upon the judgments quoted above and by arguing that once the stage of financial bids had been reached then if there was any essential condition in the terms of the tender, the same had to be adhered to. It was argued that sum total of the Form II rates could not be more than the rate quoted in Form I for complete set of number plates in different categories of vehicles, therefore, once there was such a difference, the State had no option but to Civil Writ Petition No.18725 of 2011 -11- *** reject the bid of respondent no.3.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 7 - A Kabir - Full Document
1