Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.17 seconds)West Bengal Financial Corporation And ... vs Bertram Scott (I) Ltd. (In Liquidation) on 6 October, 1982
6. We have given a careful consideration to the above decision. However, we find it difficult to subscribe to the above opinion. In our view, as earlier stated, the Court has a discretion both in the matter of grant of interest and the rate of interest. The discretion however should be exercised judiciously and interest should be granted unless there are good reasons for not granting the same.
Bank Of Bihar Ltd. vs Ramghulam Singh And Anr. on 11 January, 1932
In Bank of Bihar v. Ramghulam, the Patna High Court held that the fact that the Court is given a discretion in the matter makes it nonetheless a right of the plaintiff, that is to say, aright which he may claim.
The United Commercial Bank, Silchar vs Satish Chandra Ghosh And Anr. on 1 March, 1989
Dealing with the nature of the power of the Court under Section 34 of the CPC, in United Commercial Bank v. Satish Chandra Ghosh, the Gauhati High Court observed:
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Banking Companies (Acquisition And Transfer Of Undertakings) Act, 1970
Chaturbhuj Tulsiram Marwadi vs Ambarsing Harji on 26 March, 1931
4. The above view of ours gets full support from the decision of this Court in Chaturbhuj v. Ambarsing AIR 1931 Bom.
1