Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 377 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010
In this background and keeping in view the law as laid down
by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Preeti Gupta & Anr. Vs.
State of Jharkhand & Anr. reported in AIR 2010 SC-3363, this
Court feels that allowing prosecution of petitioners no. 1 and 2
being the mother-in-law and father-in-law of the complainant and
the petitioner no. 4 being the sister-in-law (Nanad) for the above
offences is absolutely unwarranted and amounts to a gross abuse
of process of law. However, the petitioner no.3 is liable to be
(3 of 3)
[CRLMP-2337/2016]
prosecuted as the allegations levelled against him do indicate the
ingredients of cognizable offences.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1