Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.25 seconds)

Krishan Kumar Malik vs State Of Haryana on 4 July, 2011

37. Having examined the aforesaid principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the above-mentioned cases and considering the statements and depositions made by the Informant in the instant case, I am of no doubt that the evidence of the Informant cannot be termed as of "sterling witness". The apparent variations and clear inconsistencies in Informant's versions make the same doubtful, unreliable and untrustworthy. Therefore, in my considered opinion, in absence of any material corroboration to the allegations of the Informant, solely on the basis of the statements and depositions of the Informant, the conviction of the appellant cannot be sustained.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 321 - D Verma - Full Document
1   2 Next