Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 354B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Jharkhand & Ors.Etc vs M/S Shivam Coke Industries ,Dhanbad Etc on 10 August, 2011
It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceedings of the Case No. 79 of 2024 (State vs. Shivam) arising out of Case Crime No. 171 of 2023, under Section 354B, 323, 506 I.P.C., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Prayagraj pending in the Court of Add. Civil Judge (Junior Division-21), Allahabad, during the pendency of this Application before this Hon'ble Court/or pass such other and further order, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the favour of Applicant."
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Usha Chakraborty vs State Of West Bengal on 30 January, 2023
Learned counsel has relied upon the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Usha Chakraborty and another vs. State of West Bengal and another: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 57, para nos. 9, 10 and 11 wherein the case was that case of civil nature has been given the shape of criminal case in which the applicants have been falsely implicated and summoned. It is submitted that as such the present proceedings be quashed as the same are with malafide intentions.
R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960
The case is of different colour altogether. In the present case there is allegation of enraging modesty and physical assault and it cannot by any stretch of imagination be said to be a case of civil in nature. The allegations in the present matter are such which cannot be said to be having a civil profile inasmuch as there are allegations of enraging modesty of the first informant and also physical assault on her and her father and mother. The present case does not fall within the four corners of the law as laid down in the cases of R.P. Kapur [R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, 1960 SCC OnLine SC 21 : AIR 1960 SC 866] and Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra : (2021) 19 SCC 401 for quashing. No ground exists to entertain the matter by this Court.
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
The case is of different colour altogether. In the present case there is allegation of enraging modesty and physical assault and it cannot by any stretch of imagination be said to be a case of civil in nature. The allegations in the present matter are such which cannot be said to be having a civil profile inasmuch as there are allegations of enraging modesty of the first informant and also physical assault on her and her father and mother. The present case does not fall within the four corners of the law as laid down in the cases of R.P. Kapur [R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, 1960 SCC OnLine SC 21 : AIR 1960 SC 866] and Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra : (2021) 19 SCC 401 for quashing. No ground exists to entertain the matter by this Court.
M/S Neeharika, Infrastructure Pvt. ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 13 April, 2021
The case is of different colour altogether. In the present case there is allegation of enraging modesty and physical assault and it cannot by any stretch of imagination be said to be a case of civil in nature. The allegations in the present matter are such which cannot be said to be having a civil profile inasmuch as there are allegations of enraging modesty of the first informant and also physical assault on her and her father and mother. The present case does not fall within the four corners of the law as laid down in the cases of R.P. Kapur [R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, 1960 SCC OnLine SC 21 : AIR 1960 SC 866] and Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra : (2021) 19 SCC 401 for quashing. No ground exists to entertain the matter by this Court.