Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.81 seconds)Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 356 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Roop Chand And Others vs The State Of Haryana on 16 March, 2009
In the case law reported as "Roop Chand Vs. The State of
Haryana" 1999 (1) C.L.R. 69, the Punjab & Haryana High Court had held
20.10.2009 Page 19 of 26 of Pages
FIR No. 145/01
P.S.: Jama Masjid
U/s.: 356/379/411 IPC
as under :
"3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the
evidence with their help. The recovery of illicit liquor was effected from the
possession of the petitioner during noon time and it is in the evidence of the
prosecution witnesses that some witnesses form the public were available
and they were asked to join the investigation. The explanation furnished by
the prosecution is that the independent witnesses were asked to join the
investigation but they refused to do so on the ground that their joining will
result into enmity between them and the petitioner.
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
In the case law reported as "Sadhu Singh Vs. State of Punjab"