Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)Ramkumar vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 14 September, 1989
The learned Judges took so much of pain to refer number of judgments and after elaborately discussing in detail, they have laid down the principles as stated above. This is in conformity with the judgment of the Supreme Court, reported in Raja Ramkumar v. Union of India, .
Nizamabad Corn Products (P) Ltd. By Its ... vs Vasudev Dalia on 28 August, 1992
16. The other case referred to by the counsel for the appellant is reported in Nizamabad
Corporation Products (P) Ltd., v. Vasudev Dalia, 1992 (3) ALT 303. In that case also a suit has been filed for declaration that the resolution passed in the Annual General Meeting and Board of Directors Meeting, removing a Director of the company are illegal and void. Hence this case also relating to the removal of the Director.
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 2A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 2 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 299 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Rajasthan State Road ... vs Krishna Kant Etc.Etc on 3 May, 1995
18. The other case cited by the counsel for the respondent is reported in Rajasthan S.R.T. Corporation v. Krishna Kant, . This matter arises under the Industrial Disputes Act. After referring to various decisions and after elaborate discussion, the Supreme Court has summarised various principles in paragraphs 32 of the judgment at page 1725. It is not necessary to extract all the principles. It is suffice to extract only one, which reads as follows:-