Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.32 seconds)
Dr. Anurag Bhakhar S/O Shri Atmajeet ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 10 November, 2022 cites

Association Of Medical Super ... vs Union Of India on 19 August, 2019

The submission of learned Advocate General that the High Court of Madras has refused to release the documents of the candidates on the basis of judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu Vs. P. S. Sairam & Ors. (supra), in humble opinion of this Court, the Madras High Court has taken a view that the issue of retention of documents stands concluded in view of judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Association of Medical Superspeciality Aspirants and Residents and Others (supra) and the same is binding under Article 141 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 69 - L N Rao - Full Document

N. Karthikeyan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 March, 2022

The reliance placed by learned Advocate General on the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of The Union of India Vs. M/s. D.N. Revri and Co. and Others (supra) this Court finds that the same is in respect of interpretation of arbitration clause and a contract between the parties is to be interpreted to give efficacy to the contract rather than to invalidate it. The said judgment is of no relevance and of no assistance to the learned Advocate General.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 9 - B R Gavai - Full Document

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.S.Sairam on 23 April, 2019

The submission of learned Advocate General that the issue of retention of documents by the Authorities in valid manner, is no more res integra in view of judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu Vs. P. S. Sairam & Ors. (supra), this Court finds that the different petitions were filed before the Apex Court and orders were challenged of the different High Courts and the Apex Court upheld the right of the State Government to ask for execution of bond to serve the State Government.
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 41 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Union Of India And Anr vs Paras Laminates (P) Ltd on 17 August, 1990

The reliance placed by learned Advocate General on the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India and Another Vs. Paras Laminates (P) Ltd. (supra) this Court finds that the same is in respect of interpretation of Section 129- C(5) and (6) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Apex Court has held that the powers of Tribunal are limited and the power expressly or impliedly granted has to be within the bounds of jurisdiction. The said judgment is of no assistance to learned Advocate General to the learned Advocate General.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 202 - T K Thommen - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next