Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.51 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Surender Singh vs State Of Haryana on 17 January, 2006
In this regard reliance
can be placed on Surender Singh Vs State of Haryana (2006) 9
SCC 247 wherein it was held as follows:
"the testimony of an injured witness has its
own relivancy and efficacy. The fact that
the witness is injured at the time and in the
same occurrence, lends support to the
testimony that the witness was present
during occurrence and he saw the
happening with his own eyes"
Vijay Narain Singh vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 April, 1984
The above view was followed by our own Hon'ble High
Court in Vijay Singh Vs State (2011) 2 AD Delhi 586.
Akhtar & Ors vs State Of Uttaranchal on 9 April, 2009
Similar
view was taken in Akhtar & Ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal 2009
V AD (SC) 92.
Shri Justice S.K. Ray vs State Of Orissa And Ors on 20 January, 2003
4. No one is too old to receive a punishment as per decision
in R.K.Aggarwal Vs State of Orissa AIR 1976 Supreme Court
1774 wherein it was held that
"Who knows this jail life of an old
man may by a process beyond our
ken, kindle in him a new flame of
search for the truth and make him a
finer person, inside and outside?
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 428 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Krishna Gopal Chawla & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 11 October, 2001
In this regard reliance can be placed on Krishna
Pal Vs State of U.P 1996 Cr.LJ 1134, Baleshwar Mandal Vs
State of Bihar Air 1997 SC 3471 and Yadala Venkata
Subbamma Vs Yadalla Chinna Subbaiah (dead) by LRs & Ors.
2001(8) JT 110.