Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan vs Rajesh Mohan Shukla & Ors on 12 July, 2007
13. It may be stated that the learned CGC had submitted that while the
posts of Assistants/PA/Steno-C in the Secretariat Service was filled up by direct
recruitment, similar posts in BRO etc. was a promotional post and thus,
justified the disparity and/or difference in pay. This issue appears to have been
well settled by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Nehru Yuva Kendra
Sangathan v. Rajesh Mohan Shukla & Ors., AIR 2007 SC 2509 : (2007) 6 SCC 9 .
In para 3 of the said case (as per AIR citation) it has been held to the effect
that if the two sets of employees are discharging the same duties, they cannot
be discriminated and/or treated as a class apart only on the basis of their
source of recruitment.
Union Of India vs D.G.O.F. Employees Association on 22 February, 2016
14. Moreover, as the issue arising out of the same Office Memorandum
dated 25.09.2006, was the subject matter before the Delhi High Court in the
case of D.G.O.F Employees Association and Anr.(supra) and the decision of the
Delhi High Court was affirmed by the Supreme Court of India and the case of
D.G.O.F Employees Association and Anr.(supra), there is no reason take a view
different from one taken by the learned Single Judge.
1