Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)
Further Discussion On The Motion For Consideration Of The Constitution (One ... on 20 December, 2012 cites

Suraj Bhan Meena & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 7 December, 2010

Through the 82nd Amendment, the Government allowed relaxed standards and relaxed qualifications for the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe people.… (Interruptions) All these four amendments – 77th amendment, 84th amendment, 85th amendment, and 87th amendment - were challenged in the Nagaraj case in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court in its judgement held that reservations in promotion to the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe persons are valid and they put three qualifying conditions, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and competency.… (Interruptions) The State Governments framed rules for the purpose of implementing the reservation in   promotion in the Suraj Bhan Meena Vs. the State of Rajasthan and the Government of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Rajesh Kumar.… (Interruptions) The promotion policy of the respective Governments was challenged and the court held that it is not in accordance with Nagraj’s case. They set aside the promotions for the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe persons.… (Interruptions)             Thereafter to cure this defect, the present amendment to Article 16 (4) (a) has been brought for the purpose of giving the benefit of reservation in promotion for the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe persons.… (Interruptions)           Therefore, I commend this Bill for the consideration and passing of the House. … (Interruptions)   MADAM SPEAKER: Motion moved:
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 114 - A Kabir - Full Document

U.P.Power Corp.Ltd vs Rajesh Kumar & Ors on 27 April, 2012

Through the 82nd Amendment, the Government allowed relaxed standards and relaxed qualifications for the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe people.… (Interruptions) All these four amendments – 77th amendment, 84th amendment, 85th amendment, and 87th amendment - were challenged in the Nagaraj case in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court in its judgement held that reservations in promotion to the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe persons are valid and they put three qualifying conditions, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and competency.… (Interruptions) The State Governments framed rules for the purpose of implementing the reservation in   promotion in the Suraj Bhan Meena Vs. the State of Rajasthan and the Government of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Rajesh Kumar.… (Interruptions) The promotion policy of the respective Governments was challenged and the court held that it is not in accordance with Nagraj’s case. They set aside the promotions for the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe persons.… (Interruptions)             Thereafter to cure this defect, the present amendment to Article 16 (4) (a) has been brought for the purpose of giving the benefit of reservation in promotion for the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe persons.… (Interruptions)           Therefore, I commend this Bill for the consideration and passing of the House. … (Interruptions)   MADAM SPEAKER: Motion moved:
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 203 - D Misra - Full Document
1