Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)
K.S. Venkatachalam vs The High Court on 31 March, 2006 cites

All India Judge'S Association & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 April, 1995

5. The main contention of the petitioner is to the effect that no adverse remarks had been communicated to the petitioner at any time and to his knowledge he had good record and therefore non-extension of service of the petitioner beyond 58 is not in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1993 SC 2493 (ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS). It is further submitted by way of additional grounds that the decision not to accord the benefit of service upto 60 years of age is not based on any material and it is an arbitrary decision and unfairly arrived at. It was therefore prayed that such order of the High Court in its Administrative side dated 2.11.2004 may be quashed and the petitioner should be permitted to continue in service till his 60th year.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Sarguja Transport Service vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, ... on 12 November, 1986

6. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent No.1. In such counter affidavit it has been indicated that keeping in view the principle enunciated in the decision of the Supreme Court, the case of the petitioner had been considered and the Full Court thought it fit not to extend the services of the petitioner beyond the age of 58 and such order is not arbitrary and does not call for any interference. Apart from the above defence on merit, the High Court has also taken the plea that the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner had been withdrawn and since no liberty had been given to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition, the subsequent writ petition on the same subject matter is barred under the principle enunciated in Order 23 Rule 1 CPC. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has referred to a decision of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1987 SC 88 (SARGUJA TRANSPORT SERVICE v. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, GWALIOR AND OTHERS).
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 523 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document
1