Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.65 seconds)Section 4A in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs Srinivas Sabata And Anr on 4 December, 1975
date of award. This judgment also does not take into
consideration the Constitution Bench judgment in Partap
Narain Singh Deo versus Shrinivas Sabata and another.
Therefore, the said judgment is per incuriam.
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Section 19 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Ã ... vs Mubasir Ahmed & Anr. Ã .Respondents on 1 February, 2007
"12. The abovesaid decision does support the proposition
canvassed by the learned counsel for the appellant that
an industrial settlement would operate even by overriding
a statutory provision to the contrary. However, suffice it to
observe that the Constitution Bench decision in New
Maneck Chowk Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd. and also the
decision of this Court in Hindustan Times Ltd. which is a
four-Judge Bench decision, were not placed before the
learned Judges deciding LIC of India case. A decision by
the Constitution Bench and a decision by a Bench of more
strength cannot be overlooked to treat a later decision by
a Bench of lesser strength as of a binding authority; more
so, when the attention of the Judges deciding the latter
case was not invited to the earlier decisions available."
Kerala State Electricity Board And ... vs Valsala K And Another on 16 September, 1999
Even
the judgment rendered in the Kerala State Electricity Board
versus Valsala K., was not brought to the notice of the Apex
Court.
The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
Mattulal vs Radhe Lal on 23 April, 1974
In
this behalf, reference may be made to Mattulal versus Radhe
Lal's case, AIR 1974 Supreme Court 1596.