Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.39 seconds)

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

21. It is the contention of learned counsel for the claimants that they are entitled for adding 40% of the annual income towards future prospects though the claim petition is filed under Section 163A of the Act 16 VS,J MACMA_9 of 2022 & 530 of 2021 as per National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Others (1st supra). It is observed in the said judgment that the determination of income while computing compensation has to include future prospects so that the method will come within the ambit and sweep of just compensation as postulated under Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Admittedly, compensation to be computed under Section 163 of the Motor Vehicles Act is based on a structured formula as it is based on no fault liability, as discussed earlier. Once a claimant invokes the provisions of Section 163A, the question of inclusion of pecuniary compensation for non-tangibles and future prospects does not arise.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

Branch Manager, Shriram General ... vs Dilu Rai And Ors on 4 April, 2022

22. Learned counsel for the claimants relied on several judgments passed by a single bench of this Court, but, however, the Apex Court in Deepal Girishbhai Soni and ors., Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited (2nd supra), has already held that chapter XI of the Motor Vehicles Act was enacted to provide immediate relief to a limited class of victims whose annual income does not exceed Rs.40,000/- as compensation under Section 163A and the same is determined on a structured formula basis. The Apex Court further held that in a petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, compensation has to be granted to the claimants as per II Schedule of the Motor Vehicle Act, which does not refer to awarding compensation under the head of future prospects. Hence, it can be safely concluded that the claimants are not entitled for compensation under any non-pecuniary heads except the ones mentioned in the II Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Sikkim High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - M M Rai - Full Document
1   2 Next