Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
K. Subba Reddy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 28 September, 2007
Similarly in the case of K. Subba Reddy vs. State
of A.P. (supra) money was handed over to a person who according to the prosecution
was acting as a conduit for handing over the same to the official concerned. The Apex
Court held that money handed over to Home Guard (conduit) for passing on to Excise
Inspector who had allegedly demanded the same by way of bribe in return of stock
register of complainant's wine shop according to whom money was given to him for
handing over to one S for the purpose of remitting the same to government treasury. On
the appreciation of evidence the Apex Court has held in this case that the evidence
coming on record shows that S used to do such work on behalf of shop owners. The
Apex Court found that the evidence was not sufficient to convict the Home Guard u/s 7
P.C. Act.
Subash Parbat Sonvane vs State Of Gujarat on 24 April, 2002
47. The judgment of Subash Parbat Sonvane vs. State of Gujarat (supra)
was the judgment based on its own facts. It will not be of any help to accused. Even
the complainant in this case did not support the prosecution version in cross
examination in this case and panch witnesses never stated that accused had demanded
any amount from the complainant.