Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.81 seconds)

State Of Kerala vs M. K. Krishnan Nair & Ors.Andk. ... on 14 February, 1978

8. With regard to the mode of measurement of the prohibited distance, the learned single Judge has placed reliance on Ext.P5 judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court, wherein it has been categorically held that the measurement effected by the Commissioner therein from gate to gate along the foot path and through the zebra crossing, in conformity with the traffic rules, is perfectly in order. It is true that the said decision was rendered with reference to Rule 6 (2) of the of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction ) Rules, 1974. But the fact remains that the crux of Note (2) to Rule 13(3) of the Foreign Liquor Rules now relied on by the State/Department was also in existence in a more or less similar form as a 'Note' after the third proviso to Rule 6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in WP(C) 4650/2021 -17- Auction)Rules, 1974 - having had been added as notified vide G.O.(MS.)No.136/86/TD dated 20.10.1986. The Note under Rule 13(3) of the Foreign Liquor Rules was further amended by adding the words " and the same will be measured from gate to gate" vide notification bearing No. G.O. (P) 30/93/TD dated 04.03.1993; which shows that the 'shortest distance' mentioned in the Note does not pave way to any illogical conclusions. Since the cause of action forming the subject matter of Ext. P5 judgment was of the year 1993 and since Ext.P5 verdict was passed by the Bench in October 1993 ( at a time when the restrictive Note was very much available under Rule 6(2) of the relevant Rules), it is rather puerile to contend by the State that the scope of such restriction is still to be unearthed. Anyhow, Ext. P5 judgment has not been challenged by the State and it has become final.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 75 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1