cites: 84784202

1 - 10 of 25 (0.19 seconds)

M/S. Vishwanath Sugars Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 8 February, 2008 cites

Vikram Cement vs Cce on 26 February, 2007

1) Shri Gaikwad pointed out that the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise Belgaum has held that the impugned items are not capital goods but are inputs in view of the Apex Courts decision in the case of Vikram Cements Vs CCE (2005(187) ELT 145 (SC).

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

C.C.E. vs Chengalrayan Co-Operative Sugar Mills ... on 5 January, 1989

3) CCE Vs DSM Sugar Mills (2001 (132) ELT-250)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 34 - Full Document

Sangam Processors (Bhilwara) Ltd., ... vs Cce on 10 February, 2004

5) Sangam Processors Vs CCE (2002 (147) ELT 445)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 44 - Full Document

Bellary Steels And Alloys Ltd. vs Cce on 27 January, 2005

6) Bellary Steel & Alloys Ltd., Vs CCE (2005 (180) ELT 92)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 1 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Mukand Ltd. And Ors. vs Cce on 22 March, 1999

7) Mukand Ltd., Vs CCE (2005 (182) ELT 61)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Siel Sugar vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 28 November, 1997

10) Siel Sugars Vs CCE (1998 (99) ELT 54)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

M/S. Cadila Laboratories Pvt. Ltd vs C.C.E. Vadodara on 13 February, 2003

12) Divis Laboratories Ltd., Vs CCE (2006 (73) RLT-255)

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 77 - S N Variava - Full Document

Ispat Industries Ltd. vs Cce on 22 September, 2003

13) Ispat Industries Ltd., Vs CCE (2006 (195) ELT 164)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 12 - Cited by 22 - Full Document

C.C.E., Indore vs M/S. Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. on 2 February, 2001

14) CCE Vs India Cement Ltd., (2004 (64) RLT 63)

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Ispat Industries Ltd., Om Tapadia, R. ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... on 8 May, 2001

In the case of Ispat Industries Ltd., Vs CCE Mumbai (2006 (195) ELT 164), it was held that structural items such as angles channels, plates, rods required to make machines function without any vibration or movement cannot be said to be used in the construction of building but linked with machinery used in the production of final products. Thus the modvat credit in respect of such structurals was allowed.

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 2 - Cited by 28 - Full Document

1 2 3 Next

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results