Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.82 seconds)

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

11. As regards split multiplier is concerned, the learned counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that the split multiplier would not be applicable to the case on hand as per the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the 7 case of Sarla Verma & Ors. vs Delhi Transport Corp. & Anr. reported in (2009) 2 TAC 677 (SC) and National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, where the multiplier applied even after the age of above 50 to 60 years. In view of the submissions, he prays for rejection of the appeal filed by the insurance company.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

11. As regards split multiplier is concerned, the learned counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that the split multiplier would not be applicable to the case on hand as per the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the 7 case of Sarla Verma & Ors. vs Delhi Transport Corp. & Anr. reported in (2009) 2 TAC 677 (SC) and National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, where the multiplier applied even after the age of above 50 to 60 years. In view of the submissions, he prays for rejection of the appeal filed by the insurance company.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Seema Rani And Others on 23 December, 2011

- multipliers method. Hence, we declined to accept the submissions of the learned counsel for the insurance - 11 company for adopting the split - multiplier method in this case. However, the learned counsel for the insurance company relied on the judgment of co-ordinate bench of this Court in the case of The Manager, M/s New India Assurance Company Limited vs Smt. Hema and Others in MFA No.3878/2019 dated 30.03.2021, where this Court applied the spilt multiplier by considering the age of the deceased. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court mentioned above, adopting the multiplier method in computing the compensation is not permitted. Hence, the judgment of this Court may not be applicable to this case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 3 - Y C Gupta - Full Document
1