Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.27 seconds)

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Govind Rubber (P) Ltd. on 29 January, 2003

11. We have also examined the order of the Tribunal in the case of Dy. CIT v. Govind Rubber (P) Ltd. (supra) in which the Tribunal has held that for the purpose of determining book profit under Section 115J the assessee was entitled for deduction of profit attributable to export under Section 80HHC even though the assessee was denied deduction under Section 80HHC because of the proviso to Section 80A as income computed for the assessment year under consideration was negatived though the book profit attributable to export under Section 80HHC was positive. Similar analysis should be applied to the present situation.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 16 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Brook Crompton Greaves Ltd. vs The Income-Tax Officer on 10 March, 2006

Though a contrary view was taken by the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Brook Crompton Greaves Ltd. (supra), but the Special Bench has given a specific finding in its para 59 that in the case of Section 115JB, the Finance Act made it very clear that deduction under Section 80HHC would be available in its entirety to an assessee even if the relief under Section 80HHC is eliminated in a phased manner. Relevant portion of the order of the Special Bench is extracted hereunder for the sake of reference:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 33 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next