Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.28 seconds)

J&K National Panthers Party vs The Union Of India & Ors on 9 November, 2010

In Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party v. Union of India and others, (2011)1 SCC 228, the Hon'ble Supreme Court quoted from R.C. Poudyal's case (supra), wherein the claim of the claim of the petitioner was to carry out delimitation as a result of the census operation being carried out. The court held that the concept of one person one vote to be tolerant of imbalances and departures from a very strict application and enforcement. The Court concluded to the following effect:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Lakhbir Singh Sehmee vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 30 April, 2002

Lakhbir Singh Sehmee, one of the writ petitioner had earlier invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court raising similar argument, as in the present case, by filing CWP Nos10151 & 10152 of 2002 . This Court directed that fresh voters list and delimitation of wards be completed within four months. Since the process was not completed, the petitioner filed a miscellaneous application and on such application, this Court passed a detailed order, which is reported as Lakhbir Singh Sehmee v. State of Punjab and others, 2002(3) PLR 142. The Court considered the fact that delimitation has been done on the basis of 1991 census and the same cannot be done afresh in view of the time constraint. It also considered that provisional figures of census cannot be taken into consideration. The Court also held that in view of bar of Article 243-ZG of the Constitution, the petition is not maintainable. The Court considered, inter alia, the following two questions:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - A K Goel - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next