Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.55 seconds)
Ravi Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 November, 2022 cites

Faizan Siddiqui vs Sashastra Seema Bal on 3 May, 2011

19. Petitioner has also placed reliance upon another decision of this Court in Faizan Siddiqui (Supra). In the said case, the petitioner had applied for the post of female Constable with Seema Sashastra Bal and though clearing the passing criteria, she was rejected for appointment being declared medically unfit for "congenital anomaly and pseudohermaphroditism". In the said case, this Court had observed that even if petitioner was earlier detected with "androgen insensitivity syndrome" and had undergone certain medical procedures but was declared unfit without any material basis and had therefore, directed respondents to consider her for appointment to the post of Constable, General Duty.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 9 - G Mittal - Full Document

Anish Barla vs Union Public Services Commission on 14 March, 2006

In Anish Barla (Supra), the Court considered the statement made by the counsel that the petitioner in the said case was free from all skin diseases and disapproved the manner in which he was disqualified by the Review Medical Board, as none of the members had any experience in dermatology. In the present case, it is an admitted position that petitioner‟s re-medical was conducted before INHS, Kalyani, Vishakapatnam on 24.02.2020 by the Specialist ENT, where he was declared unfit with the observation "Right ear- thin TM and immobile" and "Left ear - NAD (no abnormality detected)".
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Saurabh Kumar Singh Ex Sgt 783053-S vs Union Of India & Ors. on 7 April, 2021

In Saurabh Kumar (Supra), the petitioner had participated in recruitment process for Air Force and Indian Navy as well. The petitioner in Indian Navy had applied for the post of Artificer apprentice with Submarine Specialization and though he qualified in the examination, but was declared unfit by the Medical Board. The petitioner in the said case challenged the same on the ground that he was not rejected by the Air Force for the same condition. This Court dismissed his petition and observed as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Manmohan - Full Document
1