Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Mahant Salig Ram vs Musammat Maya Devi on 21 January, 1955 cites

Gopal Singh And Others vs Ujagar Singh And Others on 2 April, 1954

Indeed,the correctness of this paragraph was not disputed before this Court in Gopal Singh v. Ujagar Singh(1). The general custom of the Punjab being that a daughter excludes the collaterals from succession to the selfacquired property of her father the initial onus, there- fore, must, on principle, be on the collaterals to show that the general custom in favour of the daughter's succession to the self-acquired property of her father has been varied by a special local custom excluding the daughter which is binding on the parties. Indeed, it has been so held by the Judicial Committee in Mst.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 14 - V Bose - Full Document

Musammat Vaishno Ditti vs Musammat Rameshri on 18 March, 1937

Reliance is also placed on the observations of the Privy Council in Mt. Vaishno Ditti v. Mt. Rameshri(2) to the effect that the statements in the Riwaj-i-am might be accepted even if unsupported by instances. The contention is that on production by the appellant of the Riwaj-i-am of the Gurdaspur district the onus shifted to the respondent to prove instances rebutting the statements contained therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1