Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)Section 24 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Modula India vs Kamakshya Singh Deo on 27 September, 1988
In Modula India's case (supra), it was observed as under :-
Section 23 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Binayak Chandra Pady vs Kamala Padhy Alias Padhiani on 7 May, 1986
On the other hand, though the petitioner is a lawyer by profession, but he has lost his practice on account of the going litigation as his entire attention has been diverted to the present litigation as a result of which he is not in a position to justify his profession and the clients. It was vehemently submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the default committed by the petitioner is not wilful. In these circumstances, relying upon the provisions of section 23(1)(a), counsel submitted that the impugned order is totally illegal. Counsel also placed reliance upon Binayak Chandra Pady v. Kamala Padhy alias Padhiani, AIR 1987 Orissa 167 and 1964 Gujarat Law Reporter 417.
1