Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)
Smt.Gian Kaur vs The Chairman And Managing Director, ... on 12 January, 2010 cites

Sidramappa vs Rajashetty And Ors on 9 December, 1969

"13. The term "cause of action" is neither defined in the Act nor in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 but is of wide import. It has different meanings in different contexts, that is when used in the context of territorial jurisdiction or limitation or the accrual of right to sue. Generally, it is described as "bundle of facts", which if proved or admitted entitle the plaintiff to the relief prayed for. Pithily stated, "cause of action" means the cause of action for which the suit is brought. "Cause of action" is cause of action which gives occasion for and forms the foundation of the suit. (See : Sidramappa v. Rajashetty & ors. (1970) 1 SCC 186). In the context of limitation with reference to a fire insurance policy, undoubtedly, the date of accrual of cause of action has to be the date on which the fire breaks out."
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 178 - K S Hegde - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs M/S. B.S. Agricultural Industries(I) on 20 March, 2009

13. Therefore, the cause of action had arisen to the appellant in the year 1992 and filing of the complaint in the year 2009 was obviously barred by First Appeal No.1737 of 2009 5 limitation. It was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in another judgment reported as "State Bank of India v. B.S.Agricultural Industries (I), 2009 CTJ 481 (Supreme Court) (CP)" that the limitation has to be counted keeping in view the provisions of Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act, according to which, a complaint has to be filed within a period of 2 years from the date when the cause of action arises. In the aforesaid judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to observe as under : -
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 623 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1