Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.28 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 300 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Ram Pal on 27 February, 2015
In the case of State of HP Vs. Ram Pal reported in (2006)
2 SCC (Cri.) 165, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, gave following
finding upon the identical facts. The paras nos. 5 to 8 of the said
judgment are as follows: -
Dhananjay Singh @ Buddhu Singh @ Buddu ... vs The State Of Bihar on 23 November, 2016
In the case of Buddhu Singh Vs. State of Bihar (now
Jharkhand) reported in 2011 Cr. L.R. (SC) page 519 the Hon'ble
Supreme Court gave following verdict in paras nos. 6 to 9, which
reads as under:
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Chandra Mohan vs Raj. State Finance Corpn. & Anr on 7 March, 2017
In case of Chandra Mohan Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in
2006(2) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 1208, this Hon'ble Court gave the following
verdict, which reads as under:
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2013
In the case of Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad Vs. State of
Maharashtra reported in (2013) 6 SCC 770 the Hon'ble
Supreme Court, held that at the time of deciding any criminal case
it is the duty of the Court to take care of damages suffered by the
victim. In this case, the accused appellants are not challenging
the incident and ready to pay compensation, therefore, we
deemed it appropriate to pass an order of compensation also to
the wife of deceased Sahab Ram who is actual victim of quarrel.
The Hon‟ble Apex Court gave direction that it is the mandatory
duty of the Court to apply its mind in every criminal case so
as to grant compensation or to refuse compensation to the
victim. The relevant paragraph 66 of the said judgment reads
as under:-