Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 3 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. vs Bai Valu Raja And Ors. on 28 April, 1958
5. Learned counsel for the appellant brought to my notice the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. v. Bai Valu Raja (1958-II-LLJ-249) the meaning of the words 'in the course of his employment' appearing in Section 3(1) or the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 was examined. The facts in that case are as follows at p 250 :
Regional Director, E.S.I Corpn. And Anr vs Francis De Costa And Anr on 5 May, 1992
In our view, this cannot be a ground for departing from the principle laid down by the aforementioned cases that the employment of the workman does not commence until he has reached the place of employment".
Superintending Engineer, ... vs Andammal on 14 February, 1983
6. A learned single Judge on this Court in S. E. Parambikulam Aliar Project v. Andammal (1983-II-LLJ-326) held as follows at p 328 :
Section 8 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
The Explosive Substances Act, 1908
1