Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.44 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By The ... vs P. Veera Bhaarathi on 22 January, 2019
18. Thus, in view of the categorical and authoritative
pronouncement of the Supreme Court in P. Veera Bhaarathi, supra, and
the catena of Co-ordinate Bench decisions alluded to above, we hold that
13 (2021) 14 SCC 820
15/22
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/11/2025 03:26:29 pm )
W.P. (MD) No.22208 of 2024
the argument of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the
conviction of the convict prisoner of the ineligible offence will disentitle
him for premature release, does not have legs to stand.
P. Arunodhayam And K. Kanniammal vs Secretary To Government, Revenue ... on 9 April, 2008
24. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance
on Kaliammal, supra, Manikandan, supra and Kokila, supra, the said
reliance deserves only outright rejection in view of the two judgments
alluded to in the preceding paragraph.
Roja Venkatesh @ Venkatesh vs State on 14 July, 2021
In fact, the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in P. Veera
Bhaarathi, supra, has been consistently followed by Co-ordinate Benches
of this Court, not in one case, but, in as many as four cases, viz.,
P.Kaliammal, supra, Manikandan, supra, Kokila, supra and Roja
Venkatesh, supra.
A.Rizana Banu vs The State Represented By on 8 August, 2017
5. To buttress his contention that denial of premature release of
a convict prisoner on the mere apprehension of a possible wrong doing by
others is unreasonable, learned counsel relied on the decision of a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in A. Rizana Banu vs. the State8.
Zahid Hussein & Ors vs State Of West Bengal And Anr on 15 March, 2001
In support of his contention that the convict prisoner did not
come to the adverse notice of the prison authorities during the period of
his incarceration and this should have weighed in the mind of the first
respondent while considering the issue of premature release, learned
counsel invited the attention of this Court to the judgment of the Supreme
Court in Zahid Hussein and others vs. State of West Bengal and
another9.