Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.42 seconds)
Prem Kumar vs Jaskaran Singh on 1 December, 2021 cites

Lala Durga Prasad And Another vs Lala Deep Chand And Others on 18 November, 1953

"It is common ground that the plot in dispute has been transferred by the respondents and therefore the proper form of the decree would be the same as indicated at page 369 in Lala Durga Prasad v. Lala Deep Chand, 1954 SCR 360 = (AIR 1954 SC 75) viz., "to direct specific performance of the contract between the vendor and the plaintiff and direct the subsequent transferee to join in the conveyance so as to pass on the title which resides in him to the plaintiff. He does not join in any special covenants made between the plaintiff and his vendor; all he does is to pass on his title to the plaintiff". We order accordingly. The decree of the courts below is hereby set aside and the appeal is allowed with costs in this court and the High Court."
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 205 - V Bose - Full Document

Kafiladdin And Ors. vs Samiraddin And Ors. on 24 February, 1930

"In our opinion, the proper form of decree is to direct specific performance of the contract between the vendor and the plaintiff and direct the subsequent transferee to join in the conveyance so as to pass on the title which resides in him to the plaintiff. He does not join in any special convenants made between plaintiff and his vendor; all he does is to pass on his title to the plaintiff. This was the course followed by the Calcutta High Court in -Kafiladdin v. Samiraddin, AIR 1931 Cal 67 (C) and appears to be the English practice.
Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 53 - Full Document
1   2 Next