Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)
Akkala Rami Reddy, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 April, 2025 cites

Kurapati Maria Das vs M/S. Dr. Ambedkar Seva Samajan & Ors on 17 April, 2009

39. The judgment referred to by the learned counsel for petitioner are applicable to the facts of this case. The judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent would not be applicable as the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kurapati Maria Das Vs. Dr.Ambedkar Seva Samajan and Ors5, as per the facts of that case there was a serious dispute with regard to conversion into Christianity. The appellant therein denied converting into 5 2009 LawSuit (SC) 624 //19// CRLP.No.7114 of 2022 Christianity, as such, it was considered as a question of fact which the High Court could not have gone into. On the facts of this case, there is no dispute about the faith in Christianity by the 2nd respondent. Thus, the said judgment would not be helpful to the case of the 2nd respondent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 37 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document

Mohammad Sadique vs Darbara Singh Guru on 29 April, 2016

In Mohammad Sadique Vs. Dabara Singh Guru6, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also observed at para 52 of the Judgment " ...it is not essential for anyone to change one's name after embracing a different faith. However, such change in name can be a corroborating fact regarding conversion or reconversion into a religion/faith in appropriate cases..." On the facts of this case, there is no issue of change of name after converting into Christianity by the 2 nd respondent. However, he has named his son as Jadson Paul aged 7 years and daughter as Mahima Paul aged 5 years. These children are born to him after he converted into Christianity and as such has named his children with names which have Christian affinity.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 9 - P C Pant - Full Document

Chinni Appa Rao S/O.Simhachalam, 65 ... vs State Of A.P., Rep. By Its Public ... on 7 December, 2015

9. The learned counsel for the petitioners relied on a judgment in Chinni Appa Rao and others Vs. State of A.P. and Another1, the composite High Court of Andhra Pradesh considered a similar issue where a complaint was filed by a person, who was converted into Christianity and running Church had filed offences alleging under the provisions of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. The learned Judge had held that the defacto-complaint is not entitled to the concession of claiming as a member of the Scheduled Caste for the benefit of the Act. If a person who does not continue as a Scheduled Caste or Schedule Tribe as on the date of the alleged offence the protection under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act cannot be extended.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 22 - Cited by 3 - B S Rao - Full Document
1   2 Next