Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.41 seconds)

Lourdes Chandrahas Shetty (Mrs.) And ... vs Vishal Konkan Co-Operative Housing ... on 12 April, 2005

20. The aforesaid pronouncement was followed by the learned single Judge in the case of Lourdes Shetty (supra). In the later case, the petitioners therein had convened the AGM on 4 th August, 2001, in conformity with the statutory prescription. However, on that day only one subject could be discussed and subsequent meeting could not be proceeded with, because of the disturbance created and, thereafter, the meeting had to be called off. When the petitioners therein were sought to be disqualifed for default in convening the adjourned meeting, the learned single Judge, after opining that the sub rule (8) of Rule 60 had no application to the facts of the said case, held that the petitioners could not have been disqualifed. The observations in paragraph Nos. 20 and 21 are material and hence extracted below:
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - D G Deshpande - Full Document
1