Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (3.28 seconds)Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 415 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
The
court further observed that any effort to settle civil disputes
and claims, which do not involve any criminal offence, by
applying pressure through criminal prosecution should be
deprecated and discouraged.
The question before us is - whether the case of the
appellants comes under any of the categories enumerated in
Bhajan Lal (supra)? Is it a case where the allegations made
in the first information report or the complaint, even if they
are taken at their face value and accepted in entirety, do not
make out a case against the accused under Sections 420, 467
and 120B IPC? For determination of the question it becomes
relevant to note the nature of the offences alleged against the
appellants, the ingredients of the offences and the averments
made in the FIR/complaint.
Janata Dal vs H.S. Chowdhary And Ors. on 28 August, 1992
This court in Janata Dal v. H. S. Chowdhary & Others
(1992) 4 SCC 305 observed thus:
G. Sagar Suri And Anr vs State Of Up. And Ors on 28 January, 2000
132. The criminal courts are clothed with
inherent power to make such orders as may be
necessary for the ends of justice. Such power
though unrestricted and undefined should not be
capriciously or arbitrarily exercised, but should be
exercised in appropriate cases, ex debito justitiae to
do real and substantial justice for the
administration of which alone the courts exist. The
powers possessed by the High Court under section
482 of the Code are very wide and the very
plentitude of the power requires great caution in its
exercise. Courts must be careful to see that its
decision in exercise of this power is based on sound
principles.
In G. Sagar Suri & Another v. State of UP & Others
(2000) 2 SCC 636, this court observed that it is the duty and
obligation of the criminal court to exercise a great deal of
caution in issuing the process particularly when matters are
essentially of civil nature.
Roy V. D vs State Of Kerala on 10 November, 2000
This court in Roy V.D. v. State of Kerala (2000) 8 SCC
590 observed thus:-
M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004
In our opinion, exercise of
power under section 482 CrPC to quash
proceedings in a case like the one on hand, would
indeed secure the ends of justice.
This court in Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. &
Others v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Another (2005) 1 SCC
122 observed thus:-