Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.27 seconds)

Baldev Singh Bajwa vs Monish Saini on 5 October, 2005

[68] In my considered view, there is absolutely no merit in this revision petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. [69] Keeping the definition of `Non-Resident Indian' as contained in Section 2 (dd) of the Act and interpreted by the Apex Court in Baldev Singh Bajwa's case (supra), there can indeed be no doubt that both the respondents are Non-Resident Indians. While one of them holds the passport issued by the United Kingdom, the other's passport is issued by C.R. No.1385 of 2004 (O&M) & connected CRs 36 the Canadian Government. Their specific plea that they are of Indian origin has not been even controverted by the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 484 - P P Naolekar - Full Document
1   2 Next