Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)

Jan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Begban vs State Of Gujarat And Another on 18 August, 1965

2. We have heard Mr. Pakale, learned advocate for the respondent no.1 in Writ Petition No. 538 of 2005. He has cited the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1966 SC 385 (Jan Mohammad Noor Mohamad Bagban vs. State of Gujarat) and (2007) 13 SCC 116 (Veneet Agrawal vs. Union of India and Ors.) in support of the contention that 'laying' as envisaged in section 28(2) of the Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 is not mandatory.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 92 - J C Shah - Full Document

Veneet Agrawal vs Union Of India & Others on 31 October, 2007

2. We have heard Mr. Pakale, learned advocate for the respondent no.1 in Writ Petition No. 538 of 2005. He has cited the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1966 SC 385 (Jan Mohammad Noor Mohamad Bagban vs. State of Gujarat) and (2007) 13 SCC 116 (Veneet Agrawal vs. Union of India and Ors.) in support of the contention that 'laying' as envisaged in section 28(2) of the Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 is not mandatory.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 26 - Full Document
1