Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (1.41 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Article 33 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Article 20 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Article 23 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
V. C. Rangadurai vs D. Gopalan And Ors on 4 October, 1978
In appeal by special leave, the two-Judge Bench in Union of India
v. Hardy Exploration and Production (India) INC1 referred to certain
1 (2018) 7 SCC 374
3
decisions from foreign jurisdictions, namely, Naviera Amazonica
Peruana S.A. v. Compania Internacional De Seguros Del Peru2,
Hiscox v. Outhwaite3, Union of India v. McDonnell Douglas Corpn.4,
C v. D5, C v. D6, Braes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Limited v.
Alfred McAlpine Business Services Limited7, Shashoua and Ors. v.
Sharma8, Sulamerica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. and Ors. v.
Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors.9, (1) Enercon GMBH (2) Wobben
Properties GMBH v. Enercon (India) Ltd.10 and Govt. Of India v.
Petrocon India Ltd.11 Apart from the above, the decisions rendered in
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. v. ONGC Ltd. and Others12, Bhatia
International v. Bulk Trading S.A. and Another 13, Venture Global
Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. & another14,
Videocon Industries Limited v. Union of India and another15, Dozco
India Private Ltd. v. Doosan Infracore Co. Limited16, Bharat
2 (1988) (1) Lloyd’s Law Reports 116
3 (1992) 1 AC 562
4 (1993) 2 Lloyd’s Law Reports 48
5 (2007) EWCA Civ 1282 (CA)
6 (2008) 1 Lloyd’s Law Reports 239
7 (2008) EWHC 426 (TCC)
8 (2009) EWHC 957 (Comm.)
9 (2012) EWCA Civ 638
10 (2012) EWHC 3711 (Comm.)
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd vs Ongc Ltd. & Ors on 4 December, 1997
21. It was his submission that while approving the
ratio of Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. (supra)
these two factors which have some relevance on its
efficacy do not seem to have been examined in the
case of Bharat Aluminum Company (supra) .