Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.20 seconds)
Goluguri Eswara Reddy And Another vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its ... on 19 September, 2014 cites

Vilas Pandurang Pawar & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 10 September, 2012

In such circumstance and in view of the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, the learned counsel relying on the decision of this Court in Vilas Pandurang Pawar V. State of Maharashtra, submitted that the High Court is not justified in granting anticipatory bail. In similar circumstances, this Court has considered the offence under Section 3(1), as well as the bar provided under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act and concluded as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 1437 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Sheik Khasim Bi vs The State on 7 February, 1986

3. The Petitioners are A-1 and A-2. The petitioners moved the Honourable High Court in Crl.P.No.3361 of 2009 for quashing of the proceedings and by order of this Court (another bench) dated 08.12.2011 while dismissing the application for quashing from prima facie accusation, there was a direction not to arrest pending investigation. It is pursuant to which the police after completion of investigation, filed charge sheet under the above provisions against the accused persons 1 to 4 including the petitioners herein. It appears after taken cognizance under Section 190 Cr.P.C for committal of the case under Section 209 Cr.P.C, P.R.C. No.11 of 2011 allotted and the case is pending committal stage and before committing as presence of the accused is necessary and he was not arrested earlier by virtue of the order supra of the Honourable High Court, the N.B.W was issued against the accused persons for execution of N.B.W and production of them by showing in abscondence after completion of the investigation for the concession not available beyond investigation completion. It is because of the N.B.Ws pending, this application for anticipatory bail application is filed. Even post cognizance of such pending of N.B.W is not a bar for maintainability of anticipatory bail as held by the Full Bench of this Court, the decision referred in Smt.Sheik Khasim Bi V. The State .
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 4 - Cited by 27 - Full Document
1   2 Next