Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.45 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Tenancy Rules
Section 114 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Subhash Popatlal Dave vs Union Of India & Anr on 16 July, 2013
45. Nowhere
in Alka Subhash Gadia case has it been indicated that challenge to
the detention order at the pre-execution stage, can be made mainly
on the aforesaid exceptions referred to hereinabove. By perfecting
the five exceptions in which the courts could interfere with an
order of detention at the pre-execution stage, with the expression
viz . Their Lordships possibly never intended that the said
five examples were to be exclusive (sic exhaustive). In common usage
or parlance the expression viz . means in other words .
There is no aura of finality attached to the said expression. The
use of expression suggests that the five examples were intended to
be exemplars and not exclusive (sic exhaustive). On the other hand,
the Hon'ble Judges clearly indicated that the refusal to interfere
on any other ground did not amount to the abandonment of the said
power.