Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Raja Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan on 6 April, 2018
30. A similar question came up for consideration
before this Court in Raja Ram v. State of Rajasthan.
In that case, the evidence of the Doctor who was
examined as a prosecution witness showed that the
deceased was being told by one K that she should
implicate the accused or else she might have to face
prosecution. The Doctor was not declared "hostile".
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Assoo vs State Of M.P on 26 April, 2011
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Assoo Vs.
State of Madhya Pradesh reported in (2011) 14 SCC 448, in
paragraph 10 has held as follows:
Sukhwant Singh vs State Of Punjab on 28 March, 1995
11. So far the second issue is concerned, from perusal
of the record, it appears that in order to ascertain whether the
seized licensee gun was used in course of occurrence or not, the
same was sent for Forensic Science Laboratory examination,
which is evident from Ext.-6. However, the report from the
Forensic Science Laboratory has not been brought on record by the
prosecution to suggest that the recovered licensee gun of the
appellant Nathuni Singh has been used in course of occurrence.
The prosecution has also not produced the said licensee gun as
Material Exhibit during the course of trial. The prosecution has
also not explained the reason as to why the seized gun was not
produced as material exhibit and as to why the FSL report was not
brought on record. This is an omission on the part of the
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.482 of 1996 dt.15-07-2022
10/16
prosecution. Hence the allegation of the prosecution that the
appellants have used the seized licensee gun in course of
occurrence is not proved. At this juncture, we would like to refer to
the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of Sukhwant Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1995 SC
1601, wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraph 20 has held
as follows: -