Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)
P. Joseph And Ors. vs The Management Of Gopal Textile Mills ... on 21 August, 1974 cites

Girdharlal Laljibhai vs Nagrashna M.N. And Anr. on 8 January, 1964

That view appears to receive support from Girdharlal Laljibhai v. Nagrashna 1964-11 L.LJ. 235, decided by Shelat, C.J., and Mehta, J., of the Gujarat High Court. The 43 workmen had completed 240 days of continuous work in the establishment. That is the finding which is now concluded. Because to start with they were all badlis, the question is whether in view of the lay-off, they are entitled to lay-off compensation. Section 25C starts by referring to a workman and excluding from its purview badlis who are temporary workers or substitutes for permanant workmen. But the section contains an explanation the effect of which is that, if a badli had put in 240 days of continuous work, he shall cease to be regarded as such. That means that in that event he will be a workman for the purposes of S. 25C. So far, no controversy arises.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 5 - J M Shelat - Full Document
1