Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.42 seconds)

Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trivandrum on 10 April, 2008

If, with respect, the judgement of this Court in Malayala Manorama Company Limited [supra] is to be accepted, then the very purpose of enacting Section 115J of the Act would stand defeated, Page Nos.23/26 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.636 of 2016 particularly when the said section does not make any distinction between public and private limited companies. It needs to be reiterated that, once a Company falls within the ambit of it being a MAT Company, Section 115J of the Act applies and, under that section, such an assessee- Company was required to prepare its profit and loss account only in terms of Parts II and III of Schedule VI to 1956 Act. The reason being that rates of depreciation in Rule 5 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, are different from the rates specified in Schedule XIV of 1956 Act. In fact, by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, the linkage between the two has been expressly de-linked. Hence, what is incorporated in Section 115J is only Schedule VI and not Section 205 or Section 350 or Section 355.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 66 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next