Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.65 seconds)
Ashok Kumar Maurya [Objection Filed] vs State Of U.P.Through Secy.Secondery ... on 9 March, 2017
cites
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921
The U.P. High Schools And Intermediate Colleges (Payment Of Salaries Of Teachers And Other Employees) Act, 1971
Section 10 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Telangana Intermediate Education Act, 1971
The U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982
The Chandigarh Administration And ... vs Mrs. Rajni Vali And Others. on 12 January, 2000
It has been urged on behalf of the petitioner that the Apex Court in the case of Chandigarh Administration Vs. Rajnivali and others [(2000) 2 SCC 52] has hold that payment of salary to the teachers, who are imparting education to the students, is Constitutional obligation of the State. The Apex Court also condemned the practice of exploiting the services of qualified teachers. It has also been brought to the notice of the Court that in identically situated persons when were denied salary approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.5911 (SS) of 1999 and Writ Petition No.3902 (SS) of 2000 and this Court vide orders dated 18.11.1999 and 28.07.2000 respectively granted relief to the extent that salary be paid till the availability of regularly selected candidate. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for payment of salary and other service benefits and denial thereof is wholly unjustified and is an infringement of statutory right.
Section 16 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Banibrata Ghosh & Ors on 2 February, 2009
To substantiate his arguments, learned Standing Counsel has placed reliance on the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of State of West Bengal and others Vs. Banibrata Ghosh and others; [(2009) 3 SCC 250] and the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Devashish Mukherji and another Vs. State of U.P. and others; [(2007) 1 UPLBEC 188].