Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.69 seconds)
Puja Kumari Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy Deptt. ... on 8 December, 2023 cites

Kul Bhushan Mishra And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 26 September, 2018

(29) Although, the facts of Kul Bhushan Mishra's case is not directly related to the present case as the challenge before the Division bench in that matter was related to Clause 1 and 15 of the Government Order dated 2.6.2023 as well as challenge to Circular dated 8.6.2023, however in the present case, as had been observed earlier, a challenge has been laid to Clause 12(4) of the said Government Order, which also finds mention in clause 10 (4) of the order dated 08.06.2023 and explanation vide Clause 8 of the order dated 16.06.2023.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - D B Bhosale - Full Document

State Of U. P. & Ors vs Gobardhan Lal on 23 March, 2004

"8. A government servant has no vested right to remain posted at a place of his choice nor can he insist that he must be posted at one place or the other. He is liable to be transferred in the administrative exigencies from one place to the other. Transfer of an employee is not only an incident inherent in the terms of appointment but also implicit as an essential condition of service in the absence of any specific indication to the contrary. No Government can function if the government servant insists that once appointed or posted in a particular place or position, he should continue in such place or position as long as he desires (see State of U.P. v. Gobardhan Lal, SCC p. 406, para 7).
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 1319 - D Raju - Full Document

Bank Of India vs Jagjit Singh Mehta on 22 November, 1991

(iv) As held by the Apex Court in Bank of India Vs Jagjit Singh Mehta (1992) 1 SCC 306, as far as the policy requiring the two spouses to be posted at one place as far as practicable is concerned, there does not exist any inalienable right to claim such a posting. The only thing required is that the Board should consider this aspect along with the exigencies of administration and enable the two spouses to live together at one station if it is possible without any detriment to the administrative needs and the claim of other employees.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 185 - J S Verma - Full Document
1   2 3 Next