Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.40 seconds)The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002
Kailash vs Nanhku & Ors on 6 April, 2005
The ratio in Kailash (supra) was reiterated stating that the trial is
deemed to commence when the issues are settled and the case is set down
for recording of evidence.
Ajendraprasadji N. Pande & Anr vs Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N. & Ors on 8 December, 2006
We may notice that in Ajendraprasadji N. Pandey and Another v.
Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N. and Others [(2006) 12 SCC 1], this Court
noticed the decision of this Court in Kailash (supra) to hold:
Salem Advocate Bar Association,Tamil ... vs Union Of India on 2 August, 2005
In Salem Advocate Bar Assn (supra), this Court has upheld the
validity of the said proviso. In any event, the constitutionality of the said
provision is not in question before us nor we in this appeal are required to
go into the said question.
Baldev Singh & Ors. Etc vs Manohar Singh & Anr. Etc on 3 August, 2006
12. Reliance, however, has been placed by Ms. Suri on Baldev Singh and
Others v. Manohar Singh and Another [(2006) 6 SCC 498], wherein it was
opined:
Union Of India & Ors vs Major General Madan Lal Yadav [Retd.] on 22 March, 1996
9. Although in a different context, a Three-Judge Bench of this Court in
Union of India and Others v. Major General Madan Lal Yadav (Retd.)
[(1996) 4 SCC 127] took note of the dictionary meaning of the terms "trial"
and "commence" to opine: