Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)
Satish Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 7 May, 2012 cites

State Of Tamil Nadu & Anr. Etc. Etc vs Adhiyaman Educational & Research ... on 24 March, 1995

A similar question arose before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of T.N. v. Adhiyaman Educational & Research Institute and others(1995)4 SCC-104. The question before the Hon'ble Supreme Court was whether the State Government has power to grant and withdraw permission to start a technical institution as defined in the Central Act after coming into force of the All India Council for Technical Education Act,1987.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 491 - P B Sawant - Full Document

University Of Delhi vs Raj Singh on 8 September, 1994

In the case of University of Delhi v. Raj Singh AIR 1995 SC 336 certain qualifications for appointment of Lecturer were laid down by the University Grants Commission by the University Grants Commission (Qualifications required of a person for appointment to the teaching Staff of a University and Institutions affiliated to it), Regulations 1991. The University of Delhi refused to accept those regulations as binding by arguing that various provisions of Delhi University Act,1922 grant them autonomy. The Hon'ble Supreme Court while interpreting Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 alongwith Sections 12 A(2) and Section 26(1)(c) came to the conclusion that the regulations were binding on the University. The conflict which was sought to be brought before Hon'ble the Supreme Court by arguing that the CWP No. 17558 of 1999 9 Delhi University Act has granted complete autonomy to them has been resolved by referring to entry 66 in List I of Seventh Schedule.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 132 - Full Document
1