Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)
Bhom Raj vs Shakuntla Mehta on 7 January, 2019 cites

M/S. Marshall Sons & Co.(I) Ltd vs M/S.Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd. And Anr on 29 January, 1999

15 Likewise, in Marshals Sons and Co.(I) Ltd. vs. Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd. (supra), it was categorically held that once a decree for possession has been passed and execution is delayed depriving the judgment­creditor of the fruits of decree, it is necessary for the Court to pass appropriate orders so that 'reasonable' mesne profits which may be equivalent to the market rent is paid by a person who is holding over the property.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 117 - M B Shah - Full Document

M/S. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd vs M/S. Federal Motors Pvt. Ltd on 10 December, 2004

14 In Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd. (supra), it has been clearly laid down that the tenant with the passing of the decree of eviction is liable to pay mesne profits or compensation for use and occupation charges of the premises at the same rate on which the landlord would have been able to let out the premises and earn rent if the tenant would have vacated the premises.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 729 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs Unique Erectors (Gujarat) (P) Ltd. & Anr on 24 January, 1989

The tenant shall deposit use and occupation charges @ Rs. 120/­ per sq. ft. per month with effect from the date of eviction order i.e. 13.1.2017 and the same shall be deposited by him before the learned Rent Controller within three months. Thereafter the tenant shall continue to deposit the monthly rental, as aforesaid before 10 th of every month before the learned Rent Controller in terms ::: Downloaded on - 11/01/2019 23:01:25 :::HCHP 20 of para 79 of the judgment in Super Max International Pvt. Ltd.' case supra, failing which .
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 288 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Mrs. Rena Drego vs Lalchand Soni, Etc on 5 March, 1998

17 What is 'reasonable' is difficult to define and this expression being a relative term is required to be considered vis­à­vis, the fact situation obtaining in a particular case. A three Hon'ble Judge Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rena Drego (Mrs) vs. Lalchand Soni and others (1998) 3 SCC 341, considered the expression 'reasonable' in the following terms:­ [9] It is difficult to give an exact definition of the word 'reasonable'. It is often said that "an attempt to give a specific meaning to the word 'reasonable' is trying to count what is not number and measure what is not space." The author of 'Words and Phrases" (Permanent Edition) has quoted from In re Nice and Schreiber, 123 F, 987, 999 to give a plausible meaning for the said word. He says "the expression 'reasonable' is a relative term, and the facts of the particular controversy must be considered before the question as to what constitutes reasonable can be determined." It is not meant to be expedient or convenient but certainly ::: Downloaded on - 11/01/2019 23:01:25 :::HCHP 15 something more than that. While interpreting the word 'reasonable' in Section 13 of the Act, the Bombay High .
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 150 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Shri Shiv Shanker Kesari on 14 September, 2007

18 The expression 'reasonable' again came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Kesari, (2007) 7 SCC 798. It was held as under:­ "[8] The word "reasonable" has in law the prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those ::: Downloaded on - 11/01/2019 23:01:25 :::HCHP 16 circumstances of which the actor, called on to act reasonably, knows or ought to know. It is difficult to .
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 2363 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Veerayee Ammal vs Seeni Ammal on 19 October, 2001

19 Even otherwise the expression 'reasonable' would only mean "rational according to the dictates of reason and not excessive or immoderate". An act is said to be reasonable when it is conformable or agreeable to reason, having regard to the facts of the particular controversy. In other words 'reasonable' would mean what is just, fair and equitable in contradiction to anything whimsical, capricious etc. The word 'reasonable' has in law prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those circumstances of which the person concerned is called upon to act reasonably knows or ought to know as to what was reasonable. It may be unreasonable to give an exact definition of the word 'reasonable'. The reason varies in its conclusion according to idiosyncrasy of the individual and the time and circumstances in which he thinks, as has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Veerayee Ammal vs. Seeni Ammal (2002) 1 SCC 134.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 262 - Full Document
1   2 Next