Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.32 seconds)Section 397 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 398 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 402 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad & Ors vs Shantadevi P. Gaekwad (Dead)Thr.Lrs. & ... on 20 January, 2005
The fact that the Court has such powers which enable it to go beyond the ken of Section 402 is emphasised in the following observations of the supreme Court in Sangramsinh P.Gaekwad and Others V. Shantadevi P.Gaekwad, MANU/SC/0052/2005 :
Section 170 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 284 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Incable Net(Andhra) Limited & Ors vs Ap Aksh Broadband Ltd.& Ors on 7 May, 2010
35.1. As a matter of fact, in that case, where, the petitioner before the Court, had filed an action for oppression and mismanagement under the 1956 Act, it was pleaded that the majority of shareholders had oppressed the petitioners. The CLB had dismissed the petition. The appeal filed in the High Court had resulted in a similar fate.
Mr. Ayoli Abdulla vs M/S. Meezan Realtors Pvt. Ltd on 20 November, 2015
39.8. Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the NCLT, as against CLB, as the latter is no longer in existence. (see the observations contained in the judgment of the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in Ayoli Abdulla V. Meezan Realtors Pvt. Ltd., MANU/KE/0975/2016).