Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 44 (0.41 seconds)Avinash Nagra vs Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Etc on 30 September, 1996
In Avinash Nagra (supra), the obligations of teachers to transform students into responsible citizens, and inculcate the value system of the Indian Constitution, was stated thus:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sajjan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan(With Connected ... on 30 October, 1964
107. The unique place of the Preamble, in the Constitution came to be noticed very early, in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, reported at AIR 1965 SC 845. The Hon'ble Supreme Court found that the Preamble to our Constitution is "not of the common run". Further the Preamble bore the "stamp of deep deliberation" and precision.
Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru ... vs State Of Kerala And Anr on 24 April, 1973
108. This feature shines light on the special significance, attached to the Preamble by the framers of the Constitution. The Preamble was held to be a part of the Constitution, by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, reported at (1973) 4 SCC 225.
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978
109. The words 'life, law and liberty' in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, were freed from the confines of narrow and literal interpretation by the Courts. (See Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248)
Olga Tellis & Ors vs Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors. Etc on 10 July, 1985
110. A defining moment came when the Hon'ble Supreme Court, liberated "life" from the fetters of mere physical existence. (see Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corpn. Reported at (1985) 3 SCC 545).
Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration on 29 April, 1980
While construing the constitutional rights of prisoners, in Prem Shankar Shukla (supra), Krishna Iyer, J. speaking for a three-Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held:
Francis Coralie Mullin vs The Administrator, Union Territory Of ... on 13 January, 1981
114. Undermining the human dignity of a detenue, under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities (COFEPOSA) Act, 1974 was not countenanced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Francis Coralie Mullin v. UT of Delhi, reported at (1981) 1 SCC 608 by ruling thus: