Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.61 seconds)
Mohammad Sahil Khan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 August, 2020 cites

Mohd. Sahil Alias Sonu Khan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 March, 2018

The applicant will inform the concerned S.H.O. of concerned Police Station about his residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of State Counsel to send E-copy of this order to 6 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.25707/2020 (Mohammad Sahil Khan Vs. State of M.P.) SHO of concerned police station as well as concerned Superintendent of Police who shall inform the concerned SHO regarding the same.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014

However, looking to the fact that since the offence in question attracts punishment less than 7 years and therefore, in view of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (Supra), it is directed that in offences involving punishment upto seven years imprisonment the police may resort to the extreme step of arrest only when the same is necessary and the applicant do not cooperate in the investigation. The applicant should first be summoned to cooperate in the investigation. If the applicant cooperate in the investigation then the occasion of his arrest should not arise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 25720 - Full Document
1